zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. whynot+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-02 15:35:44
> The second group is one that thinks talking to a chatbot will replace senior developer

Once they realize that it doesn't replace senior but can easily replace junior, junior dev will have a bigger problem and the industry at large will have a huge problem in 8 years because the concept of "senior" would have vanished.

replies(1): >>hxuguf+Xx
2. hxuguf+Xx[view] [source] 2026-02-02 18:18:57
>>whynot+(OP)
Why would the concept of senior disappear in 8 years? I am a senior, and work with seniors that have been seniors for 20 years. In 8 years we will still be seniors.
replies(1): >>whynot+tJ
◧◩
3. whynot+tJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 19:15:57
>>hxuguf+Xx
My perspective is that each year a good chunk of senior dev leave the pure dev to go to management roles or something else and while they do that, they are replaced by junior morphing into senior.

I consider 8 years to be the real experience to be considered a senior dev.

If from now on, the amount of junior is drastically reduced, this will lead to a lack of senior in 8 years because the senior leaving should be the same proportion.

In a situation where they replace juniors with agents, yes, we'll still be senior, but just like people capable of setting a VHS recorder, our number will dwindle.

replies(1): >>hxuguf+cO
◧◩◪
4. hxuguf+cO[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 19:39:38
>>whynot+tJ
I understand. At my work nobody senior becomes a manager so I never had that perspective. Thanks for clarifying your thoughts for me.
[go to top]