zlacker

Microsoft can use OpenAI models but it's not the model that's the problem, it's the application of them. Anthropic simply knows how to execute better.

>>satvik+(OP)
they should just acquire one of the many agent code harnesses. Something like opencode works just as well as claude-code and has only been around half of the time.

>>satvik+(OP)
As evidenced by Anthropic models not performing well in github presents copilot.

>>former+Ib
I read that a few times but from my personal observations, Claude Opus 4.5 is not significantly different in GitHub Copilot. The maximum context size is smaller for sure, but I don’t think the model remembers that well when the context is huge.

>>bhadas+95
I used opencode happily for a while before switching to copilot cli. Been a minute , but I don't detect a major quality difference since they added Plan mode. Seems pretty solid, and first party if that matters to your org.

>>satvik+(OP)
Anthropic's Models are better though. It may not "perform" as well on the LLM task benchmarks, but its the only one that actual gives semi-intelligent responses and seems aligned with human wants. And yes, they definitely have much better execution. It's the only one I considered shelling out 20 bucks for.

>>doomsl+Cy2
GPT 5.2 Codex is often better and more thorough than Opus 4.5, it's just slower.