zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. gruez+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-02 14:44:23
>I don't have a contract with the advertiser to provide genuine data back about what ads I've clicked and what I haven't.

Charges of fraud doesn't require a contract to be in place. That's the whole point of criminal law, it's so that you don't need to add a "don't screw me over" clause to every interaction you make.

replies(1): >>genera+f9
2. genera+f9[view] [source] 2026-02-02 15:37:12
>>gruez+(OP)
How is that a fraud, when I don't get any money from the scheme?
replies(1): >>gruez+Ve1
◧◩
3. gruez+Ve1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 20:52:49
>>genera+f9
Gaining something isn't required: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud#Civil_fraud
replies(1): >>genera+UJ1
◧◩◪
4. genera+UJ1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 22:55:03
>>gruez+Ve1
By this logic, vandalism would be fraud too.
replies(1): >>gruez+sV1
◧◩◪◨
5. gruez+sV1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 23:45:58
>>genera+UJ1
Vandalism involves making material misrepresentations?
replies(1): >>genera+Gq4
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. genera+Gq4[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 17:00:34
>>gruez+sV1
Damaging property cost money to fix.
replies(1): >>direwo+c75
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. direwo+c75[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 19:49:16
>>genera+Gq4
Where's the misrepresentation?
replies(1): >>genera+V6b
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
8. genera+V6b[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 13:17:38
>>direwo+c75
Where is the misrepresentation in clicking on links?
[go to top]