zlacker

[parent] [thread] 24 comments
1. Crispi+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-02 02:04:35
> What's moon plus sun?

Eclipse, obviously.

replies(5): >>christ+a1 >>geuis+44 >>jraph+IB >>IsTom+qJ >>nkrisc+td1
2. christ+a1[view] [source] 2026-02-02 02:16:18
>>Crispi+(OP)
That’s sun minus moon. Moon plus sun is a wildly more massive, nuclear furnace of a moon that also engulfs the earth.
replies(8): >>dcrazy+N5 >>mcny+98 >>AuryGl+Zb >>lkjdsk+Oj >>fsckbo+Kk >>SauntS+yl >>tessie+1W >>spaced+Vn1
3. geuis+44[view] [source] 2026-02-02 02:46:56
>>Crispi+(OP)
Not obvious. Astronomers are actively looking for signatures of exomoons around exoplanets. So "sun plus moon" could mean that too.
replies(2): >>xattt+f5 >>godels+ln
◧◩
4. xattt+f5[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 02:59:17
>>geuis+44
The OP said moon + sun, rather than sun + moon. We have no idea yet if celestial math is non-communicative.
replies(1): >>BenjiW+Qd
◧◩
5. dcrazy+N5[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 03:04:46
>>christ+a1
This thread reminds me of Scribblenauts, the game where you conjure objects to solve puzzles by describing them. I suspect it was an inspiration for Baba Is You.
replies(1): >>Der_Ei+b7
◧◩◪
6. Der_Ei+b7[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 03:16:15
>>dcrazy+N5
Scribblenauts was also an early precursor to modern GenAI/word embeddings. I constantly bring it up in discussions of the history of AI for this reason.
replies(1): >>veqq+Qk
◧◩
7. mcny+98[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 03:27:42
>>christ+a1
Wait so moon plus sun != sun plus moon? :Thinking:
replies(1): >>chii+Dj
◧◩
8. AuryGl+Zb[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 04:13:36
>>christ+a1
Or potentially a sun that lasts slightly longer?
◧◩◪
9. BenjiW+Qd[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 04:34:13
>>xattt+f5
*commutative
replies(1): >>tbrown+Ff
◧◩◪◨
10. tbrown+Ff[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 04:52:20
>>BenjiW+Qd
Well, that too.
◧◩◪
11. chii+Dj[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 05:36:50
>>mcny+98
celestial objects don't need to obey algebraic commutativity!
replies(1): >>direwo+VK
◧◩
12. lkjdsk+Oj[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 05:38:35
>>christ+a1
Here i was, like an idiot, thinking it was moon light
◧◩
13. fsckbo+Kk[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 05:51:01
>>christ+a1
>Moon plus sun is a wildly more massive, nuclear furnace of a moon that also engulfs the earth.

i just looked up mass of sun vs mass of moon (they differ by 10^30 vs 10^20), and the elemental composition of the sun: the moon would entirely disappear into the insignificant digits of trace elements which are in the range of .01 % of the sun. I could be off by orders of magnitude all over the place and it would still disappear.

◧◩◪◨
14. veqq+Qk[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 05:52:32
>>Der_Ei+b7
Could you explain? :3
◧◩
15. SauntS+yl[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 06:01:55
>>christ+a1
Reminds me of this AI word combination game recently shared on HN, with almost exactly these mechanics:

https://neal.fun/infinite-craft/

For the record, Sun+Moon is indeed eclipse.

◧◩
16. godels+ln[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 06:21:08
>>geuis+44
Well you find the signature by looking for a dip in but sun's luminosity. So minus might be the better relationship here
17. jraph+IB[view] [source] 2026-02-02 09:06:00
>>Crispi+(OP)
Moon plus sun would be sun because the sun would be an absorbing element.
replies(1): >>acka+bD
◧◩
18. acka+bD[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 09:22:22
>>jraph+IB
Moon implies there is a planet the moon is orbiting. So unless the planet and its moon are too close to the sun the long term result could also be: solar system.
replies(1): >>jraph+ED
◧◩◪
19. jraph+ED[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 09:27:21
>>acka+bD
This goes to show how that plus operation is awfully defined.
replies(1): >>speed_+GU
20. IsTom+qJ[view] [source] 2026-02-02 10:22:56
>>Crispi+(OP)
INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER.
◧◩◪◨
21. direwo+VK[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 10:37:42
>>chii+Dj
I wonder if SCP-1313 does
◧◩◪◨
22. speed_+GU[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 12:13:46
>>jraph+ED
That's operator overloading for you.
◧◩
23. tessie+1W[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 12:26:39
>>christ+a1
but then eclipse + moon = sun, which doesn't make much sense either :/
24. nkrisc+td1[view] [source] 2026-02-02 14:13:45
>>Crispi+(OP)
The set of celestial objects visible to the naked eye during the day.
◧◩
25. spaced+Vn1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 15:12:54
>>christ+a1
Not sure about that. You can't have an eclipse without both the moon and the sun. Ergo, the eclipse is the totality (sorry!) of the sun and moon, or sun+moon (+very specific boundary conditions).

Still think it was a good response :)

[go to top]