zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
5 comments
1. camina+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2026-02-02 01:36:47
Yes, an admin changed the headline.
Original headline was misleading and editorialized.
replies(1):
>>javawi+k
◧
2. javawi+k
[view]
[source]
2026-02-02 01:39:39
>>camina+(OP)
Got it. Out of curiosity, what was it?
replies(1):
>>camina+D
◧◩
3. camina+D
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-02-02 01:42:34
>>javawi+k
From memory, "Apple has 76% margin in Services"
replies(1):
>>javawi+vh
◧◩◪
4. javawi+vh
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-02-02 04:38:53
>>camina+D
Ah, very fair. Without otherwise taking a position on the article, I can totally see how that's editorialized.
replies(1):
>>conorc+iQ
◧◩◪◨
5. conorc+iQ
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-02-02 10:59:10
>>javawi+vh
Would prefer if dang/admins added subtitle or bracketed the altered title
replies(1):
>>camina+JY
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. camina+JY
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-02-02 12:20:02
>>conorc+iQ
Usually, admins make a simple comment upon edit. But not really required given it's an explicit policy in HN guidelines.
[go to top]