zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. rhubar+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-31 18:40:56
Well, if you believe you’re powered by physical neurons and not spooky magic, that doesn’t seem very different from being a neural net.

I see no evidence for you magical ability to behave outside of being a function of context and memory.

You don’t think diffusion models are capable of novelty?

replies(2): >>turtle+95 >>pllbnk+Lb
2. turtle+95[view] [source] 2026-01-31 19:06:27
>>rhubar+(OP)
lol, I love the irrational confidence of the dunning kruger effect
3. pllbnk+Lb[view] [source] 2026-01-31 19:48:28
>>rhubar+(OP)
Neural networks is an extremely loose and simplified approximation of how actual biological brain neural pathways work. It’s simplified to the point that there’s basically nothing in common.
replies(1): >>rhubar+im7
◧◩
4. rhubar+im7[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 07:20:06
>>pllbnk+Lb
Whilst the substrates may be different, that does not mean the general principles are.

Visual cortex and computer vision show striking similarities, as do language processing.

[go to top]