zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
4 comments
1. tonyed+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2026-01-30 08:35:29
It's much harder to prove the non-existence of something than the existence.
replies(2):
>>ChrisG+34
>>pjaoko+a52
◧
2. ChrisG+34
[view]
[source]
2026-01-30 09:13:59
>>tonyed+(OP)
Just show the concept either is not where it is claimed to be or that it is incoherent.
replies(1):
>>mrbomb+fs
◧◩
3. mrbomb+fs
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-01-30 12:31:05
>>ChrisG+34
I say this as someone who believes in a higher being, we have played this game before, the ethereal thing can just move to someplace science can’t get to, it is not really a valid argument for existence.
replies(1):
>>ChrisG+Mu
◧◩◪
4. ChrisG+Mu
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-01-30 12:51:22
>>mrbomb+fs
what argument?
◧
5. pjaoko+a52
[view]
[source]
2026-01-30 21:11:23
>>tonyed+(OP)
The question wasn't about which is harder, it was asking for proof.
[go to top]