zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. pjscot+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-30 08:06:18
So it looks to be just the latency improvement that's noteworthy, then. Thank you!
replies(2): >>sfblah+w3 >>egl202+nE1
2. sfblah+w3[view] [source] 2026-01-30 08:39:50
>>pjscot+(OP)
Yes. Sorry for the brief answer. Too bad I got downvoted. There's no size improvement.
replies(1): >>kortil+AA2
3. egl202+nE1[view] [source] 2026-01-30 18:36:01
>>pjscot+(OP)
Maybe coverage, too?
◧◩
4. kortil+AA2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-31 00:02:45
>>sfblah+w3
It got downvoted because it had no info about why you claimed there was no improvement.

SpaceX wouldn’t waste money developing a system that had no improvement over what space force already offers.

replies(1): >>sfblah+ET9
◧◩◪
5. sfblah+ET9[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 19:00:48
>>kortil+AA2
They would if they could bilk more taxpayer money for it.
[go to top]