zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. bluray+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-30 07:34:22
and openclaw.com is a law firm.
replies(5): >>NewJaz+e >>kube-s+u >>raverb+x5 >>brna-2+Ic >>throw3+Qo1
2. NewJaz+e[view] [source] 2026-01-30 07:36:22
>>bluray+(OP)
Yeah I was about to say... Don't fall into the Anguilla domain name hack trap. At the very least, buy a backup domain under an affordable gTLD. I guess the .com is taken, hopefully some others are still available (org, net, ... others)

Edit: looks like org is taken. Net and xyz were registered today... Hopefully one of them by the openclaw creators. All the cheap/common gtlds are indeed taken.

3. kube-s+u[view] [source] 2026-01-30 07:37:58
>>bluray+(OP)
From a trademark perspective, that’s totally fine.
replies(1): >>NewJaz+11
◧◩
4. NewJaz+11[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-30 07:42:18
>>kube-s+u
Yeah there's no risk of confusion, legally or in reality. If anything, having a reputable business is better than whatever the heck will end up on openclaw.net or openclaw.xyz (both registered today btw).
5. raverb+x5[view] [source] 2026-01-30 08:24:21
>>bluray+(OP)
Breaking news: tech bro unable to do basic research on existing trademarks, news at 11
6. brna-2+Ic[view] [source] 2026-01-30 09:31:29
>>bluray+(OP)
The page says - Hadir Helal, Partner - Open Chance & Associates Law Firm

This looks to me like:

- the page belongs to the person - not to the firm

- domain should be openCALW and not CLAW

- page could look better

- they also have the domain openchancelaw.com

Maybe Hadir is open to donating the domain or for a exchange of some kind, like an up to date web page or something along these lines.

7. throw3+Qo1[view] [source] 2026-01-30 17:04:53
>>bluray+(OP)
How appropriate.
[go to top]