zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. pizlon+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-28 03:34:47
I pasted a subset of the Fil-C source code into your tool and it says 6 person years. I just pasted the compiler pass and the obvious parts of the runtime.

Note that I started the project in Nov 2023 and can only work on it maybe 1-2 hours a day because it's just a side project.

So I think your tool either estimates based on very bad programmers, or it's just wrong. Or maybe 10x programmers are real and I am him

replies(2): >>simonw+P8 >>lifthr+SB
2. simonw+P8[view] [source] 2026-01-28 05:06:18
>>pizlon+(OP)
Here's more about the COCOMO model it uses: https://dwheeler.com/sloccount/sloccount.html#cocomo
replies(1): >>pizlon+K9
◧◩
3. pizlon+K9[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-28 05:15:13
>>simonw+P8
Sounds like nonsensical pseudoscience
replies(1): >>simonw+0w1
4. lifthr+SB[view] [source] 2026-01-28 09:32:35
>>pizlon+(OP)
These metrics necessarily have to underestimate programmer skills because those are not directly controllable. If there is any sort of rigor in these metrics (i.e. I don't know if COCOMO is one of them) they will probably assume, say, a mundane programmer whose performance is worse than 90/95/99% of all other programmers.
◧◩◪
5. simonw+0w1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-28 15:27:49
>>pizlon+K9
I don't take those results very seriously myself, but have you seen anything better?
replies(1): >>pizlon+8a2
◧◩◪◨
6. pizlon+8a2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-28 17:57:45
>>simonw+0w1
No

To me this is a case where knowing that you don't have data is better than having data and pretending it means anything

[go to top]