zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. e-dard+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2026-01-26 23:22:28
Replace _is_ with _can be_ and I think the general point still stands.
replies(2):
>>fmbb+d1
>>jrflow+5j
◧
2. fmbb+d1
[view]
[source]
2026-01-26 23:30:51
>>e-dard+(OP)
Sounds like just as big an assumption.
◧
3. jrflow+5j
[view]
[source]
2026-01-27 01:31:12
>>e-dard+(OP)
Replacing “is” with “can be” is in practical terms the same thing as replacing “is” with “isn’t”
[go to top]