zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. Solubl+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-26 02:59:47
I'm going to be controversial and say that this is an interesting spectacle but it is not even remotely comparable to the difficulty of what was going on in Free Solo. This is a circus trick by comparison to that.

For example I think a lot of 'good' climbers with several multi pitch climbs behind them could do this building fairly comfortably with ropes and really the only thing interesting about this is he did it without safety equipment which is frankly just a bit daft.

(I have climbed pretty extensively in the UK and also in Yangshuo China). I was kind of 'intermediate/good' at one point.

replies(1): >>defros+Q
2. defros+Q[view] [source] 2026-01-26 03:08:30
>>Solubl+(OP)
It's not contraversial at all - buildings are extremely predictable (

to a point, see: >>46750654 and consider that the initial overhang pass failed due to not finding an open bottomed window cleaning track to slot into, they backed up, tried another spar, and success )

this was an exercise of focus, indifference to exposure, and fitness to complete the 1,660 odd feet of ascent.

> he did it without safety equipment which is frankly just a bit daft.

People vary a lot, I had spent a few years climbing before someone pointed out that you could use ropes and protection .. indoor climbing gyms were fun for a while but never really became a thing of great interest for myself.

[go to top]