zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. public+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-24 21:12:30
Are you sure? I thought it was Renoir or Batut, or Bresson, or perhaps Watteau, who, when asked for his most useful advice to a new artist, famously uttered this short and mysterious phrase. Could have sworn LaBeouf quoted it in an interview after he collaborated with artist Cantor on their magnum opus.
replies(1): >>wiethe+Z8
2. wiethe+Z8[view] [source] 2026-01-24 22:16:38
>>public+(OP)
It could be a niche quote in an art history book, but it could hardly be qualified as a saying.

I asked around since my first comment and not a single person knew about it.

replies(1): >>public+Eb
◧◩
3. public+Eb[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-24 22:38:06
>>wiethe+Z8
It's so memorable, probably why it stick in my memory: how can you have a canvas without a wall? The wall is the canvas. Yet the wall simultaneously constrains the canvas, thus allowing it to become the canvas, to become worthy of a canvas. This French idiom says so much without saying practically anything.
replies(1): >>dxdm+5r1
◧◩◪
4. dxdm+5r1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-25 11:47:59
>>public+Eb
Coming back at this with a fresh mind, whoever said it could also have meant that every painting should be displayed: it requires a wall to hang on.

As you say, it's not immediately clear what is meant.

replies(1): >>public+fH1
◧◩◪◨
5. public+fH1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-25 14:17:07
>>dxdm+5r1
Even more evidence of how versatile that French phrase is. There's just so many acceptable meanings to it, and every one of them points to the same conclusion: bounds enable art.
[go to top]