zlacker

They whistleblowed themselves that Claude Cowork was coded by Claude Code… :)

>>sixtyj+(OP)
Whistleblowed dog food.

>>sixtyj+(OP)
You can tell they’re all vibe coded.

Claude iOS app, Claude on the web (including Claude Code on the web) and Claude Code are some of the buggiest tools I have ever had to use on a daily basis. I’m including monstrosities like Altium and Solidworks and Vivado in the mix - software that actually does real shit constrained by the laws of physics rather than slinging basic JSON and strings around over HTTP.

It’s an utter embarrassment to the field of software engineering that they can’t even beat a single nine of reliability in their consumer facing products and if it wasn’t for the advantage Opus has over other models, they’d be dead in the water.

>>notsur+W2
normally you don't share your dog food when you find out it actually sucks.

>>throwu+Da
You're right.

https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues

Codex has less but they also had quite a few outages in December. And I don't think Codex is as popular as Claude Code but that could change.

>>throwu+Da
Single nine reliability would be 90% uptime lol. For 99.9% we call it triple 9 reliability.

>>loopdo+ny
Single 9 would be 90%, which is roughly what I’m experiencing between CC for Web and the Claude iOS app. About 1 in 10 messages fail because of an unknown error and 1 in 10 CC for web sessions die irrecoverably. It’d probably be worse except for the fact that CC’s bugs in the terminal aren’t show stoppers like they are on web/mobile.

The only way Anthropic has two or three nines is in read only mode, but that’s be like measuring AWS using the console uptime while ignoring the actual control plane.

>>throwu+Da
hey, they have 9 8's

>>throwu+Da
Even their status page (which are usually gamed) shows two 9s over the past 90 days.

>>loopdo+ny
Single nine could be just 9% :D

>>cactus+Kg
Don't bother filing issues there. Their issue tracker is a galaxy-sized joke. They automatically close issues after 30 days of inactivity even if they weren't fixed, just to keep the issue count low.

The Reasonable Man might think that an AI company OF ALL COMPANIES would be able to use AI to triage bug tickets and reproduce them, but no! They expect humans to keep wasting their own time reproducing, pinging tickets and correcting Claude when it makes mistakes.

Random example: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/12358

First reply from Anthropic: "Found 3 possible duplicate issues: This issue will be automatically closed as a duplicate in 3 days."

User replies, two of the tickets are irrelevant, one didn't help.

Second reply: "This issue has been inactive for 30 days. If the issue is still occurring, please comment to let us know. Otherwise, this issue will be automatically closed in 30 days for housekeeping purposes."

Every ticket I ever filed was auto-closed for inactivity. Complete waste of time. I won't bother filing bugs again.

>>qcnguy+7o1
> Every ticket I ever filed was auto-closed for inactivity. Complete waste of time. I won't bother filing bugs again.

Upcoming Anthropic Press Release: By using Claude to direct users to existing bugs reports, we have reduced tickets requiring direct action by xx% and even reduced the rate of incoming tickets

>>throwu+Da
The worst part is it's not getting better. It's getting even more unstable. They are the most unstable product, every 10 minutes is another bug, the same bugs that have existed the entire year I used it reported by hundreds of people. And every day is just, a new bug, never anything fixed. It just gets worse.