zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. gruez+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-21 00:16:15
>What's frustrating is the author's comments here in this thread are clearly LLM text as well

Again, clearly? I can see how people might be tipped off at the blog post because of the headings (and apparently the it's not x, it's y pattern), but I can't see anything in the comments that would make me think it was "clearly" LLM-generated.

replies(1): >>scratc+wd
2. scratc+wd[view] [source] 2026-01-21 02:18:33
>>gruez+(OP)
Honestly, I can't point out some specific giveaway, but if you've interacted with LLMs enough you can simply tell. It's kinda like recognizing someones voice.

One way of describing it is that I've heard the exact same argument/paragraph structure and sentence structure many times with different words swapped in. When you see this in almost every sentence, it becomes a lot more obvious. Similar to how if you read a huge amount of one author, you will likely be able to pick their work out of a lineup. Having read hundreds of thousands of words of LLM generated text, I have a strong understanding of the ChatGPT style of writing.

[go to top]