zlacker

Just stop already with the LLM witch-hunt. Your personal LLM vibes don't equate to "obviously LLM generated".

>>wrs+(OP)
My "LLM witch-hunt" got the prompter to reveal the reply they received, which we now learn is neither from Valve nor says "Won't Fix" but rather deems it not a security exploit by HackerOne's definition. It is more important than ever before to be critical of the content you consume rather than blindly believing everything you read on the internet. Learning to detect LLM writing which represents a new, major channel of misinformation is one aspect of that.

>>anonym+Y
Do you have any evidence that your witch hunt caused him to show that? It could have simply been your pointing out that Valve's response wasn't shown in the article. No witch-hunts needed.

>>anonym+Y
I'm not sure how you know you're correctly detecting LLM writing. My own writing has been "detected" because of "obvious" indicators like em-dashes, compound sentences, and even (remember 2024?) using the word "delve", and I assure you I'm 100% human. So the track record of people "learning to detect LLM writing" isn't great in my experience. And I don't see why I should have to change my entirely human writing style because of this.