zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. nl+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-20 21:53:22
Sure.

The point is that your statement about the ability to do RL is wrong.

Additionally your response to the Deepseek paper in the other subthread shows profound and deliberate ignorance.

replies(1): >>measur+sf
2. measur+sf[view] [source] 2026-01-20 23:37:52
>>nl+(OP)
Theorycrafting is very easy. Not a single person in this thread has shown any code to do what they're suggesting. You have access to the best models & yet you still haven't managed to prompt it to give you the code to prove your point so spare me any further theoretical responses. Either show the code to do exactly what you're saying is possible or admit you lack the relevant understanding to back up your claims.
replies(1): >>nl+uS
◧◩
3. nl+uS[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-21 05:50:09
>>measur+sf
> You have access to the best models & yet you still haven't managed to prompt it to give you the code to prove your point so spare me any further theoretical responses. Either show the code to do exactly what you're saying is possible

GPU poor here though...

To quote someone (you...) on the internet:

> More generally, don't ask random people on the internet to do work for you for free.

>>46689232

replies(1): >>measur+uZ
◧◩◪
4. measur+uZ[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-21 07:00:43
>>nl+uS
Claims require evidence & if you are unwilling to present it then admit you do not have any evidence to support your claims. It's not complicated. Either RL works & you have evidence or you do not know & can not claim that it works w/o first doing the required due diligence which (shockingly) actually requires work instead of empty theory crafting & hand waving.
[go to top]