zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. tossan+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-20 07:19:32
I can't seem to find in the repo what optimizes this language for LLMs and benchmarks for why it works?
replies(1): >>cherio+y1
◧
2. cherio+y1[view] [source] 2026-01-20 07:34:52
>>tossan+(OP)
The author's answers are toward the bottom of the README, https://github.com/jordanhubbard/nanolang?tab=readme-ov-file...
replies(1): >>dysoco+VX
◧◩
3. dysoco+VX[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-20 15:11:03
>>cherio+y1
I understand the effort and it seems like a nice little language but wouldn't it make more sense to target already existing C--, QBE, LLVMIR or similar? There must be "simpler C" languages already which sounds more useful given that LLMs must've been trained on them.
[go to top]