zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. skciva+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-17 06:45:58
I'm not a fan of this either but I fail to see how its much different than the happy path tech demos of old.
replies(1): >>drawfl+Cq
2. drawfl+Cq[view] [source] 2026-01-17 12:29:28
>>skciva+(OP)
The happy path was functional.
replies(1): >>horsaw+wv
◧◩
3. horsaw+wv[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-17 13:19:20
>>drawfl+Cq
Mmm, as someone forced to write a lot of last minute demos for a startup right out of school that ended up raising ~100MM, there's a fair bit of wiggle room in "Functional".

Not that I would excuse Cursor if they're fudging this either - My opinion is that a large part of the growing skepticism and general disillusionment that permeates among engineers in the industry (ex - the jokes about exiting tech to be a farmer or carpenter, or things like https://imgur.com/6wbgy2L) comes from seeing first hand that being misleading, abusive, or outright lying are often rewarded quite well, and it's not a particularly new phenomenon.

replies(1): >>drawfl+WG
◧◩◪
4. drawfl+WG[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-17 14:57:06
>>horsaw+wv
But this isn’t wiggle room, it flat out doesn’t compile or run.
replies(1): >>horsaw+Zw9
◧◩◪◨
5. horsaw+Zw9[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-20 15:06:10
>>drawfl+WG
Yes. Very naive to assume the demos do.

The worst of them are literal mockups of a feature in the same vein as figma... a screenshot with a hotzone that when clicked shows another screenshot that implies a thing was done, when no such thing was done.

[go to top]