zlacker

Just because historians haven't yet given the beast a name, it acts and growls just like like exactly what it is, and "civil war" is exactly what some members of the federal administration want, as you might read in their brazen proclamations about re-interpreting the constitution along a hundred dimensions at once.

https://www.project2025.observer/en

The local and federal authorities are at a complete standoff right now. When's the last time you recall a local government essentially asking the court for permission to deploy its national guard to enforce a restraining order against the federal government? All while said federal government was openly conducting sloppy pseudo-urban-warfare in broad daylight?

I urge you to pay attention.

>>blurbl+(OP)
I'm paying attention, just not buying into administration wanting a civil war.

Won't happen.

>>mlrtim+C4
Regardless, would you agree that we're watching a constitutional crisis unfold? The stability of case law is being completely undermined.

>>blurbl+MR
I won't defend certain current practices, you are trying to shoehorn me into a yes/no answer to fit me into a side. I won't play that game.

>>mlrtim+lc3
I'm not trying to fit you into a side, especially not politically. What I'm pushing back on specifically is any insinuation that this will just blow over. That to me is hypernormalization.

And it's not that "the administration as a whole" wants devastation, but study up on what Stephen Miller wants.