zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. stackg+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-15 15:47:04
Exactly my point
replies(1): >>hydrog+Pl
2. hydrog+Pl[view] [source] 2026-01-15 17:01:39
>>stackg+(OP)
I didn't mean to counter your point, but to highlight it.
replies(1): >>stackg+ir
◧◩
3. stackg+ir[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-15 17:21:03
>>hydrog+Pl
Ah okay, I misunderstood, my bad
[go to top]