zlacker

You’re treating disagreement as evidence of moral failure, then using that to retroactively justify the label. That’s not reasoning — it’s tribal sorting. You must exist in quite a bubble, a rapidly shrinking one.

>>sanity+(OP)
You have the causality backwards. Your moral stance is abhorrent, therefore I disagree with you and want nothing to do with you. Not the other way around.

>>sanity+(OP)
You can't dismiss other people's assessment of your politics just because they are different from yours. That makes no sense.

>>amroch+Y4
My moral stance is abhorrent to about 7% of the population who the other 93% want nothing to do with.

I'll get over it.

>>sanity+W7
You've been listening to too much Fox News and Trump Truth Social posts if you think 93% of the population is bigoted racists.

>>DonHop+Jw1
No, 93% of the population want nothing to do with extreme left wing socialist mob politics.

>>DonHop+Jw1
You're making my point for me.