zlacker

> A cyberattack targeting an oncology journal has taken it offline that published a peer-reviewed study from Tufts and Brown University exploring links of COVID injections to newly diagnosed or rapidly worsened cancer shortly after COVID injections. Did this have anything to do with your cancer? It doesn't seem like this kind of question is allowed to be entertained either.

We had billions of COVID shots. Even if there was a weak correlation with 1% of the people going on to get rapidly worsening cancer we'd be seeing cancer spikes everywhere. Do we have anything remotely close to that in real life?

Why'd you call him Clott Adams?

>>bdhe+(OP)
Seeing them and hearing about them in the media are different things. You have to look for data yourself - it won't come to you.

I met several people working in cancer medicine, and they tell me that they're seeing the spikes. And some statistics showed very early that something is wrong. But chances are low you'll read anything about that in the media.

Look around and see who is dying. It's an old saying about wars that people will not bother to check if something is going wrong before not at least 5-10% of the population have died.

>>bdhe+(OP)
Scott Adams said "anti-VAX were right— accidentally"

Just search for it and read about his dialog with the community around the shot.

He was given the nick name "clott adams" for buying the official narrative at first and getting boosted.

https://x.com/sablaah/status/1610002947135475713?s=20