zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. tehjok+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-13 22:54:15
It was a pro-segregation stance. Heinously racist.
replies(1): >>antony+Gr
2. antony+Gr[view] [source] 2026-01-14 01:42:07
>>tehjok+(OP)
To be fair (RIP my fake internet points) - we spent the better part of the last 15 years hearing about how we needed special “safe spaces” for all the minorities. So if they are asking for self-segregation what are we to conclude? The sword cuts both ways…
replies(1): >>tehjok+QB
◧◩
3. tehjok+QB[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-14 03:21:03
>>antony+Gr
There's a place for oppressed groups to get together to discuss things, but for the most part, various forms of segregation, even when well intended, are a very bad idea. Sometimes people innovate segregation for "good" reasons. This could be regarded as a conservative turn within a minority group. Strictly following that logic leads us to the same place.
[go to top]