zlacker

“His peaks—the biting humor about corporate absurdity, the writing on systems thinking and compounding habits, the clarity about the gap between what organizations say and what they do—unquestionably made me healthier, happier, and wealthier.”

Maybe I’m getting cynical, yet every time I see an mdash and rules of 3, it triggers the feeling of “This sounds like AI” …

Here’s another example:

“ I can avoid the ugliness—the racism, the grievance, the need to be right at any cost.”

>>kgarte+(OP)
LLM writing is bleeding back into normal peoples' styles. I've been having to catch myself from starting comments with some variation of "great point, let's drill down into that".

>>kgarte+(OP)
I've been a heavy emdash user for decades. I have never and will never pass AI writing off as my own -- it defeats the whole purpose for me. Please realize that many of us have been using them for a long time. I really don't want to stop.

>>kyleca+pc
I'm also not saying that the parent is AI generated. Just, that the text triggered for me my "Might be AI" alert. It's not only the em dash but the combination of em dash and rules of three (plus a couple of other hints).

>>kgarte+(OP)
this plus the word "quiet" also triggered my "maybe AI" alarm

>>kgarte+9j
I get it, and for all I know this may actually be AI generated. Mine was as much a plea to the masses. But it's a lost cause, I find myself editing to explicitly sound human all the time now.

I've had more than one person think my personal communication was written by an LLM. It's such a strange and unexpected problem to have.

>>kgarte+9j
I think your instinct is very likely correct - I also immediately tripped on the language.

>>kgarte+(OP)
AI learned from human writing -- stuff like what I write all the time.

>>kgarte+(OP)
We’re going to get to AGI more quickly than expected if humanity keeps on lowering the bar.