zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. TheOth+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-13 18:47:04
The purity spiral on the other side is already batshit. "If you support that we're going to say you're bad and not buy your work" is quite a way from widespread physical and media violence.

Adams was a mediocre bureaucrat who discovered he could make a living as a competent comedian. His success at that persuaded him that he was an Important Moral Authority.

He started as a banker and ended as a self-harming prosperity preacher - not exactly a rare archetype in the US.

The funny parts were funny. The rest, not so much.

replies(1): >>inglor+bw2
2. inglor+bw2[view] [source] 2026-01-14 12:47:43
>>TheOth+(OP)
"His success at that persuaded him that he was an Important Moral Authority."

Isn't this rather common in artists? Bono of U2 comes to mind as a very pronounced example.

The problem with being a well-known artist is that you have way too many sycophants. Imagine getting dozens of ChatGPT-like fawning messages every day, but from real people, and not just over e-mail, but whenever you stray out of your house and someone recognizes you.

That will mess with self-image of almost everyone except the most stoic personalities.

[go to top]