zlacker

"Acknowledge the ugliness and try to do better" and purging art and history are different things. The comment you replied to above did not call for a purging of Adams' work or life from history.

>>stetra+(OP)
It seems to me that, even here in this discussion, people call for avoiding work of such authors. Would that entail, say, pressure on galleries not to show such art? If so, that is more than half way to a purge.

>>inglor+11
Personally avoiding consumption and calling for a purge from history are not equivalent.

Even calling for a boycott or lack of commercialization of something is not purging from history.

>>inglor+11
That's not purging at all, words have meaning. If you grep my comment you might be encountering a massive bug if you found the word purge.

You can still stream all of Crystal Castles songs on every platform, you can still buy their music, their albums still have hundreds of seeders on trackers. Just as I'm sure you can buy your Dilbert books.

Telling people to maybe look up to better humans, which it needs to be stated have always existed and aren't a modern invention, should be encouraged.

One of the other threads in here an OP states that we should use this moment to reflect and do better in our own lives, what is wrong with this viewpoint?

We've seen countless examples of people getting sucked into social media holes and I've yet to encounter a single case where this has ever led to healthy outcomes.

>>inglor+11
People often like to conflate criticism and personal choice with censorship, but they're not the same.

We're allowed to avoid consuming the work of artists we think are horrible humans. We're allowed to encourage others to do that too even. None of that is purging or censorship.