zlacker

The online world breeds extremism. It wasn't too long ago criticizing someone on their obituary was considered classless. This is the world we have made.

>>Cuuugi+(OP)
Unwillingness to engage with others breeds extremism. There are many who are silenced if they do not fit into the social dogma. Those people eventually lose it if they can't find a productive outlet.

>>Cuuugi+(OP)
Completely agree. If you're motivated enough about a topic to post about it online, you're probably emotional about it and unable to see it in a clear-headed manner.

The people I know who have the most reasonable political opinions never post about it online. The people who have developed unhealthy and biased obsessions are the ones who post constantly.

>>Cuuugi+(OP)
> It wasn't too long ago criticizing someone on their obituary was considered classless.

It's very easy to avoid getting criticized in your obituary, don't be an asshole.

If you devote your life to being an asshole, the civilized response gloves will come off and maybe more people should learn this lesson.

>>office+i8
The implication is that you are attacking the defenseless. There is none more defenseless than the dead.

>>Cuuugi+1d
No one cares less about defending themselves being attacked than the dead.

>>Cuuugi+1d
Not true.

1. Plenty of living people defend the reputations of dead people.

2. There's no proof that anything we say or do has any impact on dead people.

>>mcdonj+vm
Well, if you think of person as a bunch of ideas, maybe with a mind attached, then by attacking a dead person you're attacking a bunch of vulnerable ideas that no longer have a mind to defend them. You can still call it a person, if you like.

>>fogus+dm
No one is less tolerant of attacks than the dead.

>>Cuuugi+1d
Godwin's law approaching

>>andrew+q2
> If you're motivated enough about a topic to post about it online, you're probably emotional about it and unable to see it in a clear-headed manner.

> The people I know who have the most reasonable political opinions never post about it online.

And here you are posting your opinions online! How fascinating. I hope you recognize the extreme irony in the fact that you were motivated enough about this topic to post about it.

>>card_z+Fr
>You can still call it a person, if you like.

No thanks, because a person is not a group of ideas + a mind.

>>andrew+q2
Heh... do you realize that your comment undermines itself?

>>twixfe+bT
You didn't say what you mean, so I'll guess you mean souls, and you didn't say it because you're embarrassed.