zlacker

[parent] [thread] 23 comments
1. SkyPun+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-12 17:15:05
Processed foods are much cheaper per calorie than "healthy" options.

GLP-1 helped me kick my cravings for junk food, but that just meant I was eating more of the "expensive" stuff. Instead of $0.50 worth of Doritos as a snack, I'm eating $1.50 worth of Greek yogurt and $1.50 worth of fruit.

replies(4): >>zahlma+xb >>NoLink+7E1 >>kstene+jE1 >>kjkjad+rx3
2. zahlma+xb[view] [source] 2026-01-12 18:13:07
>>SkyPun+(OP)
> Processed foods are much cheaper per calorie than "healthy" options.

> Instead of $0.50 worth of Doritos as a snack, I'm eating $1.50 worth of Greek yogurt and $1.50 worth of fruit.

I won't bother with currency conversion because we're comparing ratios.

50 cents here gets a third of a 200g bag of generic brand potato chips, so 360 calories. Doritos are probably at least twice that expensive but whatever. (The generic-brand sandwich cookies that are my personal vice, are cheaper yet. There's so much variation within these vaguely-defined food categories that I can't take the comparison across categories seriously.)

$1.50 gets probably a half dozen bananas here, at around a hundred calories per. Never mind the yogurt. (If you're buying fresh cut fruit you're simply doing it wrong.)

So if you're purely comparing calorie counts and finding yourself on less-calorie-dense options then yeah there's a ratio but it's still not as bad as people think. But this is still fundamentally committing a fallacy equating "less calorie-dense" with "healthy".

The same 360 calories from white rice cost me perhaps 15 or 20 cents (plus the time and energy to cook). I'm not big on brown rice but I'm sure I don't have to pay several times as much for it unless it's some fancy boutique thing. 360 calories from dried split legumes (packed with protein and fibre), similarly, are in the ballpark of 30 cents. Perhaps you don't "snack" on those things, but you get the point.

replies(2): >>vorpal+vs1 >>pixl97+Hu1
◧◩
3. vorpal+vs1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 03:20:06
>>zahlma+xb
And this is the issue with these "healthy"/"processed" discussions.

If you live off bananas and rice, you are not going to be healthy. You can get just as fat off plantains as you can doritos.

Peanut butter (which is at least partially processed) can be a healthy part of your diet. It can also absolutely wreck it.

replies(1): >>derekp+AG1
◧◩
4. pixl97+Hu1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 03:44:05
>>zahlma+xb
One particular thing on items like bananas and yogurt is they are very quickly perishable. You better be around and have a plan to eat them.

Same with rice and beans, unless you're buying instant packs you have to plan and cook them, and be around to eat the leftovers.

This is the thing about most crap foods. They require no commitment. Keep them around for months. Even after opening them they last for days or weeks.

Processed foods don't require the further processing you're leaving out of the equation.

replies(2): >>tzs+lD1 >>throwa+EG1
◧◩◪
5. tzs+lD1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 05:46:22
>>pixl97+Hu1
> Same with rice and beans, unless you're buying instant packs you have to plan and cook them, and be around to eat the leftovers.

You can freeze cooked rice for months with very little loss of quality, and reheating frozen rice is quick and easy. Just put the frozen rice in a bowl, add a little bit of water, cover, and microwave for 3 minutes.

I make 12 servings in my rice cooker, then fill 12 one serving containers and freeze them.

6. NoLink+7E1[view] [source] 2026-01-13 05:55:01
>>SkyPun+(OP)
No this is the most repeated and most incorrect thing in the whole debate about food.

More than a billion asians eat nutritious, cheap and calorie-balanced meals every day, unprocessed.

Staples like legumes and rice don't cost much and are very nutritious. And supplementing with moderate amounts of seasonal fruits and vegetables and moderate animal protein is still very affordable and healthy.

A kilo of (dry) legumes is about $3.50, about 3500 calories (50% more than an average human needs per day), delivers >200 grams of protein, > 100 grams of fiber, some healthy fats and enough carbs to power you and a good set of vitamins.

Hell if you get down to it, vitamin pills to supplement any deficiencies is a budgetary rounding error.

Compare that to either Doritos and you don't get anywhere close. Doritos cost >$10 per kilo, and cost >$100 per kilo of protein, has low fiber, high fat, high salt. It's not nutritious, actively harmful and actually extremely expensive to fuel the body this way.

And it makes sense: processing ingredients leads to a more expensive product than the base ingredients. This is true in every economic sector. Only uniquely, in the food sector ultra-processing doesn't only lead to higher prices for the customer (the reason companies do it in the first place) but also less healthy outcomes.

Doritos are made of corn and vegetable oil. The prices of these ingredients are orders of magnitude lower than the end-product. Corn is like 30 cents per kilo, oil about $1.50. If you want the same nutrients without processing like frying etc, you can eat literal orders of magnitude cheaper.

replies(4): >>cthalu+vN1 >>blell+kW1 >>Der_Ei+NM2 >>firstp+LM3
7. kstene+jE1[view] [source] 2026-01-13 05:57:23
>>SkyPun+(OP)
Greek yogurt is super easy (and cheap) to make yourself if you have an instant pot:

Put 3L of milk and some starter from your last yogurt batch in the instant pot and press the "yogurt" button. Set an alarm for 10h.

Pour the yogurt into a strainer lined with a cheese cloth, and a capture vessel underneath for the whey, then put it in the fridge overnight.

You now have 1.5L of Greek yogurt that tastes head and shoulders better than anything you'd get at the supermarket. Takes me about a week to eat it all.

If you're worried about a spoiled batch ruining your next starter, you can take the whey from the straining step, pour it into an ice cube tray, and keep it in the freezer. 2 cubes is plenty for 3L of milk and can keep for 6 months.

replies(1): >>kjkjad+Ny3
◧◩◪
8. derekp+AG1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 06:29:04
>>vorpal+vs1
"let me meet your fat fruit friends" https://youtube.com/shorts/Cp4093Dzt4E
replies(1): >>vorpal+Qz4
◧◩◪
9. throwa+EG1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 06:30:39
>>pixl97+Hu1
I pressure cook beans. On induction or gas it takes about an hour to make a gallon beans from dry, and then I eat that for one meal a day for a week. You can get a 3 quart pressure cooker and just make less. I’ve also seen people use stainless steel bowls to cook multiple things in the same pressure cooker.
◧◩
10. cthalu+vN1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 07:45:02
>>NoLink+7E1
> More than a billion asians eat nutritious, cheap and calorie-balanced meals every day, unprocessed. [...] rice

This is one of those reasons that the term 'processed' food is stupid. White rice is a very processed food - what is the removal of the bran and germ but processing? And many other 'processed' foods undergo processing with the same sort of ramifications for health.

Legumes are also not complete proteins in the majority of cases - soy is a significant exception here. Soy has a PDCAAS of 1, the same as whey, but lentils range from .5 to .7, many beans are around .6, etc., and this can end up meaning your 200g of protein ends up being quite different in impact to many of your body's uses for protein than someone else's 200g of protein.

replies(1): >>themk+x82
◧◩
11. blell+kW1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 09:22:54
>>NoLink+7E1
This is the kind of thing that looks good on paper but then breaks down when you try it.

If you are seriously comparing the attractiveness of “legumes” (what legume and recipe is that?) with the attractiveness of Doritos I don’t know what to tell you.

If you cook something that is nearly as attractive as ultra processed foods, the price skyrockets.

replies(3): >>lan321+G72 >>nottor+qF2 >>NoLink+UJ5
◧◩◪
12. lan321+G72[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 11:14:49
>>blell+kW1
Grandparent:

> Processed foods are much cheaper per calorie than "healthy" options.

Attractive is a separate topic. Regardless of budget, for many people a chocolate cake will always be the most attractive food, regardless of cost. Doesn't mean we should have people living on chocolate cake diets.

◧◩◪
13. themk+x82[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 11:21:32
>>cthalu+vN1
PDCAAS is dumb when looking at multiple foods. E.g., beans and rice, when consumed together, are like, 0.99, depending on the ratio. That is, the sum is greater than the parts.
replies(1): >>cthalu+zK2
◧◩◪
14. nottor+qF2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 14:45:44
>>blell+kW1
Indians and Chinese would like a word with you...
◧◩◪◨
15. cthalu+zK2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 15:07:03
>>themk+x82
Adding rice might get you close to that for the amount of rice you eat, but 1 cup of beans will get you 16g of protein and 1 cup of rice will get you 4g of protein.

So a chunk of your protein intake would still be incomplete. It's not like the ratios are perfect so that a cup of each gets you 20g of PDCAAS 1.0 protein. Doing some quick napkin math looking at the AA makeup and protein digestibility of the two, it's like 14g equivalent of PDCAAS 1.0 protein.

~25% is a pretty significant gap if you're trying to hit optimal levels for things like muscle growth, etc.

replies(1): >>themk+cc5
◧◩
16. Der_Ei+NM2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 15:17:28
>>NoLink+7E1
You are SO SO wrong if you think ASIANS are not eating processed garbage slop food too.

Please actually go to east asia, go into their markets, and look on their shelves. They have SO much processed crap. Most Asians will gleefully tell you their love of the worst possible instant noodle (i.e. Mama brand) along with American cheese or other slop on top. Asians have the highest food standards when they want to, but their lows are as low as ours are. They love love LOVE spam for gosh sakes!

Also white rice has terrible macros and is why they have crazy rates of Diabetes despite low obesity rates.

replies(1): >>NoLink+GK5
17. kjkjad+rx3[view] [source] 2026-01-13 18:01:38
>>SkyPun+(OP)
Are you really only eating $0.50 worth of doritos? Large bags of chips are like $8 now. Imagine 1/16th of that bag which isn’t all that large of course. It would be like four chips.
◧◩
18. kjkjad+Ny3[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 18:06:36
>>kstene+jE1
Even easier is to do it in quart mason jars imo after heating the milk to 190f for 30 mins in a pot and allowing to cool to 110f before seeding with bacteria. No need to strain with cheesecloth after incubation, just pour out off the top if desired. 12hrs incubation seems to work best for me. Going from frozen definitely needs 12hr as the bacteria will be slower starting than unfrozen source. You can get away with merely some scrapings off a yogurt ice cube as sufficient for seeding. Seems it can keep for a lot longer than 6 months in freezer fwiw; my freezeback is probably over two years old and still just as viable.
◧◩
19. firstp+LM3[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 18:57:55
>>NoLink+7E1
From a US perspective at least, you are right but also wrong. Like yes, it's cheaper to buy raw potatoes and dried beans and cook healthy food vs. ultra-processed "junk food." However, when most people attempt to eat healthy they do not opt for dried beans and potatoes every day. There is a huge time cost to preparing those ingredients.

And anecdotally, when I am eating healthier I am opting for a larger range of ingredients. Probably to keep my mouth interested as I am not getting the food that's been engineered to be perfect to my palate. While potatoes and beans are in my diet, I am also opting for a lot of vegetables that are more expensive, paying more for fresh herbs and interesting spices. I am almost always buying canned beans, sauces, and other foods with some processing to speed up prep time.

I think your analysis suffers from comparing processed food engineered to taste great to the blandest, driest raw ingredients. Factoring in the time and secondary ingredients to make those raw ingredients taste great adds a lot of cost. Add in the cost of more varied ingredients bc very few people want to eat beans, potatoes, rice, and bland chicken every day. And further, you're missing the savings processed foods add by being shelf stable. They can sit on a shelf or in a freezer for months or years vs. fresh produce with a much shorter lifespan.

So yes you can eat very cheap and very healthy, the vast majority of people will loathe that life over time. You can eat kind of cheap, very healthy, with a limited number of ingredients and have things taste great if you have a LOT of time to devote to cooking, this will still not satisfy many.

replies(1): >>NoLink+PM5
◧◩◪◨
20. vorpal+Qz4[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-13 22:07:27
>>derekp+AG1
There are millions of people who are obese - not just fat - primarily from fruits. Those people have a history of obesity preceeding modern processed foods, and it's because they have very dense fruits (and starches) available to them in plenty.

My mentioning plantains wasn't random.

◧◩◪◨⬒
21. themk+cc5[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-14 01:57:27
>>cthalu+zK2
From what you just wrote, it appears you misunderstood what I said. Just to be clear:

Red kidney beans (50g): PDCAAS = 0.88, Protein = 11.25g Basmati rice (50g): PDCAAS = 0.7, Protein = 4.5g

Red beans + rice (50g, 50g): PDCAAS = 1.0, Protein = 15.75g

Milk (500g..): PDCAAS = 1.0, Protein = 15.5g

So, from a protein perspective (according to PDCAAS), 500g of milk will give you the same amount of usable protein as the 100g rice and beans meal. There is nothing left on the table.

So, just eating kidney beans, PDCAAS would say that you aren't really getting the full benefit of the "protein on the label". But once you combine it with rice, you are getting the full benefit (according to PDCAAS).

You can't look at the digestibility of the two foods in isolation to make the calculations.

As long as you are eating a varied diet, PDCAAS is pretty pointless. If you have an eating disorder, or food scarcity issues, then it might become important.

◧◩◪
22. NoLink+UJ5[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-14 07:51:39
>>blell+kW1
Eh there was no comparison at all in attractiveness, but purely in price per calorie / nutrition. I don't see the issue in the comparison?

OP said processed foods are cheaper per calorie than healthy, i.e. eating healthy is more expensive and more difficult.

Nothing at all was said about 'processed foods are more tasty, thus eating healthy is more difficulty', so I didn't reply to it.

Then OP provided Doritos as an example. And I countered by showing that the worlds staple foods eaten by billions, non-processed, are much cheaper than eating processed foods like Doritos example OP gave. That's all.

Now as for your point on taste: try eating a nice daal at your local Indian restaurant and tell me you'd rather eat bags of doritos every day for breakfast, lunch or dinner. If you prefer Doritos then I don't know what to tell YOU.

◧◩◪
23. NoLink+GK5[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-14 07:58:59
>>Der_Ei+NM2
> You are SO SO wrong if you think

I don't.

> Please actually go to east asia

I'm posting from east-Asia.

I know Asians also eat crap. That's why I said 1 billion, not 5 billion Asians eat nutritious staple foods.

> Also white rice

I didn't mention white rice. -- Not a great staple, but even if I had to play devil's advocate for rice, it's easy competition against doritos.

◧◩◪
24. NoLink+PM5[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-14 08:20:59
>>firstp+LM3
I just want to clarify that I'm obviously not suggesting to eat 3500 calories of beans daily, and that's it. Just like I did not straw-man OP by claiming he was arguing that we should live on 100% doritos.

I just made a simple comparison between two food types, on the one had the example OP gave (doritos), and on the other hand the most common staple foods eaten in the world, like grains and legumes.

Again if I have to repeat that, the most common staple foods in the world.

That I hope does enough to dissuade you from making the argument that eating these ingredients is a ridiculous endeavor. It's actually what the majority of healthy humans eat on this planet for centuries, the standard, the norm.

It's for anyone obese to figure out why they don't apply this norm.

Take legumes for example, cooked as a Daal it is eaten by more than a billion people all the time. 20 to 30 different types of pulses are cooked, and hundreds of recipies exist. If you walk into your local Indian restaurant, you'll experience a wide range of intense flavors. To say these are the blandest ingredients is incorrect, virtually everyone would prefer to eat such food daily compared to doritos for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

The idea that ultra-processed foods are a staple in my diet, is insanity. I'd be disgusted. I love ultra-processed foods as an occasional snack, not as a diet. My diet is healthy, affordable and tasty. Google and youtube are full of examples of affordable, tasty meals.

Minimal processing is completely fine by the way. There's little wrong with a good canned bean for example, great shelf life, minimal salt, maximal convenience, good nutrition, good price. Thrown into a salad with a simple dressing of olive oil and lemon juice, with some cut vegetables, gives a complete meal. Not more expensive than doritos, healthy, full of vitamins, calories, low glycemic index, protein, and 'cooking' is a matter of throwing the ingredients in a bowl and mixing, childs' play.

Same with the daals I mentioned, mostly a matter of throwing ingredients into a pot. Cooks itself with no supervision in less than half an hour while you're on your phone. Stores 5 days in the fridge or months in the freezer. Can be a great breakfast or dinner multiple times a week.

There's just tons of these options that are delicious and easy, cheap and quick, enjoyed by billions. Obese people just need better education and mentorship in my opinion. I could never be fat because my parents and environment showed me normal food culture, without it I'd probably be fat. I truly believe in the power of mentorship here, which isn't properly institutionalised or commercialised, which is why so many people lack it.

[go to top]