zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. insane+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-12 15:46:42
That's not "a touch" misleading. It's very misleading.
replies(1): >>HDThor+0m
2. HDThor+0m[view] [source] 2026-01-12 17:14:37
>>insane+(OP)
Unless the title was changed, it says "average" which to me pretty clearly means it's measuring individual or household consumption
replies(1): >>a123b4+SO
◧◩
3. a123b4+SO[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-12 19:39:15
>>HDThor+0m
The question is what average; some people apparently view "in the US" as implying US population-level averages (which it does not explicitly imply), whereas authors report the average within adopting households, which for this study's data source, all happen to be in the US
replies(1): >>HDThor+k71
◧◩◪
4. HDThor+k71[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-12 21:05:42
>>a123b4+SO
If the claim was just that grocery spending is down 5.3% across the country they wouldnt have said average, the title would just be "Ozempic reduced grocery spending by 5.3% in the US"
[go to top]