Thank you for proving my point. In one scenario, you argue that ICE has the right to perform an extrajudicial murder because he felt threatened by a car. In this scenario, you defend ICE hitting someone with their car whose only crime was walking nearby. Your only consistent belief is that anything that ICE does is justified. The kind of person you are is incredibly clear.
>>fzeror+(OP)
<< The kind of person you are is incredibly clear.
Oh? What kind of a person am I? Or maybe more interestingly, what kind of a person should I be? The second question is more interesting as it is intended to elicit your hopes and dreams.