zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. banana+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-09 19:11:54
the front wheel never pointed at the PO.

My whole point is that this isn’t true. Look at the first video I linked, in the first couple of seconds, the cop is in front of the bumper, the cars wheels are still pointing slightly to the left, on their way to center, as she guns the engine. The loss of traction on the icy road is the only reason the PO had a chance to jump out of the way (but apparently by the NYT analysis, he might have been still hit). And at this point he is correct to think the driver is dangerous and might harm somebody.

replies(2): >>_DeadF+E >>throwa+13
2. _DeadF+E[view] [source] 2026-01-09 19:14:20
>>banana+(OP)
ICE has routinely done this to protestors, on film. Are you saying those occurrences were attempted murder and ICE should be prosecuted?

If it's an offense worthy of a mother being murdered and a child orphaned, extrajudicially on the street, then surely the much lighter sentence of imprisonment for attempted murder by ICE officers would be called for, all things being the same, correct? At the least they should be tried and taken to court, wouldn't you agree?

replies(1): >>banana+U1
◧◩
3. banana+U1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-09 19:19:34
>>_DeadF+E
I have only looked at this incident closely. If in other incidents ICE agents ran down civilians, yes, of course they should be taken to trial.
replies(1): >>fzeror+ms1
4. throwa+13[view] [source] 2026-01-09 19:23:55
>>banana+(OP)
And my point is, apply regular human behavior to the scene. Drivers know the ground they are on and the acceleration curves of their cars. Arguing over split seconds to derive a malicious intention of the driver is cherry picking. We all know those near collisions we dodged closely from own experiences, thats why its so easy for us to imagine such an outcome in that video, which was prob her expectation too.
replies(1): >>banana+n4
◧◩
5. banana+n4[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-09 19:30:11
>>throwa+13
Alright, at the very least, can we admit that there is an argument to be made here? The innocence or guilt of the officer does seem to hinge on some fine details, I’m just surprised that anybody is already claiming with certainty that this is or isn’t murder.
replies(1): >>throwa+J7
◧◩◪
6. throwa+J7[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-09 19:45:24
>>banana+n4
Its messy for sure. POs are allowed to use force to stop violent/aggressive suspects in cars, so he might get cleared of the coming murder charge. We will see.

The bigger picture isnt messy at all though. Deescalation is usually the way to go with protestors because they usually dont have harmful intent. This intention seems to be completely missing, from the exexutive layer down to officers in the streets.

replies(1): >>metaph+Ce
◧◩◪◨
7. metaph+Ce[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-09 20:16:07
>>throwa+J7
It is incomprehensible to me how the 2nd and 3rd shot from side window would not count as murder. A neighborhood isn't war zone where a sign of disobedience is a fair kill. Blasphemy of 1st amendment.
◧◩◪
8. fzeror+ms1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-10 06:49:07
>>banana+U1
There was another incident last month in Minneapolis where ICE ran down a citizen with their car [1]. Do you agree that the appropriate response in that situation would be to respond with lethal force in accordance with your previous stances here?

Now, why do you think ICE agents are not being taken to trial? Why do you think the federal government is doing all that they can to protect them? And why are you, specifically, working overtime to give them the benefit of the doubt?

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/ICE_Watch/comments/1pjye82/ice_agen...

[go to top]