zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. baxuz+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-09 00:08:13
It is a solved problem with ZKPs
replies(1): >>FloorE+v6
2. FloorE+v6[view] [source] 2026-01-09 00:54:32
>>baxuz+(OP)
I studied ZKPs. You and I must have very different understandings of the actual scope of the problem. Like I said, everything that exists or is being worked on that makes a dent (including ZKPs) is incomplete or has ugly trade offs.

Maybe you are thinking purely from a math / theoretical perspective, but I'm thinking of a compete solution that's practical to use to solve the problem for sites like HN and many others.

replies(1): >>baxuz+Xe2
◧◩
3. baxuz+Xe2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-09 18:09:56
>>FloorE+v6
That is true, and I'm also working in the industry.

We are currently in dire need of ZKP providers / abstractions that will aggregate both eIDs and tradition IDV (scans).

However it's extremely important that the technical capability is there. The next step is to build upon it, and I think that it's a great time for something like this due to all the horrible implementations of identity verifications currently available — that is 3rd party companies collecting scans of documents and biometrics.

[go to top]