zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. mothba+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-08 00:00:13
He's deploying the national guard because anyone with half a brain understands riots are likely. His reasoning has to not betray that though; even if he legitimately intends to use the NG to block ICE that's not the primary reason why he's sending them out right after the exact conditions are met that caused utter chaos in Minneapolis before.

It's just better politically to say "to stop ICE" rather than say "shit's looking like it could pop off and I need to be prepared either way."

replies(1): >>baubin+l1
2. baubin+l1[view] [source] 2026-01-08 00:08:44
>>mothba+(OP)
Yeah, I get the riot threat and I’m not suggesting that the National Guard is being called to stop ICE. But instead questioning what it means to have the guard come in to “protect” areas that are likely going to be where people are protesting against ICE. That pits the National Guard in opposition to ICE. Washington, DC just went through a version of this but different because it wasn’t the local National Guard and it wasn’t the local politicians calling them in. In either case, having one law enforcement agency occupying the same space as another without explicit coordination between them (and in this case where one is being called because of the actions of the other) is dicey and strikes me as meaningful and potentially dangerous escalation of the situation.
[go to top]