zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. treis+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-07 20:38:51
The bigger problem is nutritional density. I tried meeting the 1-1.5 g/kg protein level through a vegetarian whole grains diet and it's a lot of flipping food. Equivalent of like 3kg of chickpeas a day to make it.

It was definitely eye opening on the sort of ancient benefit of meat. It's really hard to reach your muscular potential without it.

replies(1): >>rafram+d2
2. rafram+d2[view] [source] 2026-01-07 20:47:33
>>treis+(OP)
An adult who weighs 75 kg, so is targeting about 75 grams of protein intake per day, would only need to eat 833 grams of cooked chickpeas (which are 9% protein by weight) to get there. That is indeed a lot of chickpeas! But a lot less than you claimed, and you probably shouldn't be getting all your protein from chickpeas anyway.
replies(1): >>treis+h4
◧◩
3. treis+h4[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-07 20:55:17
>>rafram+d2
You're probably talking about dry weight. My can says 6g protein / 130 g. I'm about 100kg and to hit the 1.6 g protein/kg I need 160g of protein. 6g/130g * 3500 g is 161 g of protein.
replies(1): >>rafram+07
◧◩◪
4. rafram+07[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-07 21:03:52
>>treis+h4
Two numbers from the USDA:

- Canned, drained and rinsed: 7g protein / 100g [1]

- Boiled: 9g protein / 100g [2]

Not sure what explains the discrepancy (though the second number is much older), but both are considerably higher than what your can says. Sure you aren't reading a per-serving amount?

[1]: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/food-details/2644288/nutrients

[2]: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/food-details/173757/nutrients

replies(1): >>treis+a8
◧◩◪◨
5. treis+a8[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-07 21:08:04
>>rafram+07
Nope, here's the can:

https://www.kroger.com/p/kroger-garbanzo-beans/0001111010648

replies(1): >>rafram+g9
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. rafram+g9[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-07 21:11:39
>>treis+a8
Net weight (3.5 * 130g = 455g) includes the liquid, which you'd normally drain before cooking. The beans themselves are much more nutrient-dense.
[go to top]