zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. chrisj+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-05 20:53:42
> for good intentioned participants (like me) who may stumble with spicy / controversial comments from time to time.

Have you been shadowbanned for comments merely controversial?

replies(2): >>tonyme+V6 >>tonyme+f7
◧
2. tonyme+V6[view] [source] 2026-01-05 21:28:41
>>chrisj+(OP)
On comments promoting OF, I said "go back to your porn, dude"
replies(1): >>chrisj+Pp1
◧
3. tonyme+f7[view] [source] 2026-01-05 21:30:22
>>chrisj+(OP)
here's the context, btw. And just to be clear, I'm not trying to litigate my bans or anything. They were just (within the mods frame)

>>41535790

my OP is about informing users when they are banned without having to consult the mods.

replies(1): >>chrisj+BA
◧◩
4. chrisj+BA[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-06 00:13:14
>>tonyme+f7
Thanks. So seemingly no.
replies(1): >>tonyme+bR
◧◩◪
5. tonyme+bR[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-06 02:39:06
>>chrisj+BA
Can you try to make a point
replies(1): >>chrisj+4A1
◧◩
6. chrisj+Pp1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-06 09:17:56
>>tonyme+V6
Thanks. That's clear.
replies(1): >>tonyme+pB2
◧◩◪◨
7. chrisj+4A1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-06 10:57:52
>>tonyme+bR
Yes, if any further point needed making.
◧◩◪
8. tonyme+pB2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-06 16:53:20
>>chrisj+Pp1
I can see from your comments why you are taking this position.
replies(1): >>chrisj+eK2
◧◩◪◨
9. chrisj+eK2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-06 17:24:20
>>tonyme+pB2
Good to know.
[go to top]