zlacker

Doesn’t sound like you really seem to be interested in any sort of rational dialogue, metrics were “objectively” not better? What are you talking about of course they were have you even looked at benchmark progression for every benchmark we have?

You don’t understand what an exponential is or apparently what the benchmark numbers even are or possibly even how we actually measure model performance and the very real challenges and nuances involved but yet I’m “spitting some revisionist BS”. You have cited zero sources and are calling measured numbers “revisionist”.

You are also citing reception to models as some sort of indication of their performance, which is yet another confusing part of your reasoning.

I do agree that “metrics were were very clear” it just seems you don’t happen to understand what they are or what they mean.