zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. rorytb+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-02 13:27:20
I spotted Ghostty using 20GB+ memory a few days ago on MacOS (according to Activity Monitor). I went through all my tmux sessions, killed everything, it was still 20GB+ so I re-started Ghostty. If I see it happen again, I'll take some notes.
replies(2): >>xpe+S7 >>wizzwi+xB
2. xpe+S7[view] [source] 2026-01-02 14:21:43
>>rorytb+(OP)
On some level, that's impressive. Any idea of how long Ghostty was alive? Maybe this a new feature where Ghostty stores LLM model parameters in the terminal scrollback history? /s
replies(1): >>rorytb+vW
3. wizzwi+xB[view] [source] 2026-01-02 17:03:07
>>rorytb+(OP)
Complete speculation, but does tmux use the xterm alternative screen buffer? I can see a small bug in that causing huge memory leaks, but not showing up in testing.
◧◩
4. rorytb+vW[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-02 19:01:08
>>xpe+S7
Not which parts of this are sarcastic or not, but it was probably running for a few weeks. High variance on that estimate though. I was running 5+ Claude Code instances and a similar number of vim instances.
[go to top]