zlacker

I agree -- skepticism is totally healthy. And there are so many great ways to poke holes in the true underlying narratives (not the headlines that people seem to pull from). E.g. evaluation science is a wasteland (not for wont of very smart people trying very hard to get them right). How do we tackle the power requirements in a way that is sustainable? Etc. etc.

But stuff like this im not sure I understand:

> It's a great tool, but right now it's only being used to feed the greed.

if its a great tool, then how is it _only_ being used to "feed the greed" and what do you mean by that?

Also I think folks are quick to make analogies to other points in history: "AI is like the dot com boom we're going to crash and burn" and "AI is like {self driving cars, crypto, etc} and the promises will all be broken, its all hype" but this removes the nuance: all of these things are extremely different with very specific dynamics that in _some_ ways may be similar but in many crucial and important ways are completely different.

>>aspenm+(OP)
>> if its a great tool, then how is it _only_ being used to "feed the greed" and what do you mean by that?

Look around?

>>Humbly+3C
Very confused, I still don’t know what you mean at all

>>Humbly+3C
You meant someone using Claude Code is greedy?