zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. closew+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-01 16:55:50
You’re arguing against a straw man. No one is claiming LLMs have beliefs, intentions, or understanding. They don’t need them to be economically useful.
replies(1): >>windex+9Q
2. windex+9Q[view] [source] 2026-01-01 22:28:50
>>closew+(OP)
Oh yes, they are.

And beyond people claiming that LLMs are basically sentient you have people like CamperBob2 who made this wild claim:

"""There's no such thing as people without language, except for infants and those who are so mentally incapacitated that the answer is self-evidently "No, they cannot."

Language is the substrate of reason. It doesn't need to be spoken or written, but it's a necessary and (as it turns out) sufficient component of thought."""

Let that sink. They literally think that there's no such thing as people without language. Talk about a wild and ignorant take on life in general!

replies(1): >>Camper+qg1
◧◩
3. Camper+qg1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-02 01:48:27
>>windex+9Q
How'd they communicate with the test subjects?

That's "language."

[go to top]