zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. baq+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-01 11:04:35
Nice. Did it realize the mistake and corrected it?
replies(1): >>techpr+91
2. techpr+91[view] [source] 2026-01-01 11:17:10
>>baq+(OP)
Nope, I did get a lot of fancy markdown with emojis though so I guess that was a nice tradeoff.

In general, even with access to the entire code base (which is very small), I find the inherent need in the models to satisfy the prompter to be their biggest flaw since it tends to constantly lead down this path. I often have to correct over convoluted SQL too because my problems are simple and the training data seems to favor extremely advanced operations.

[go to top]