zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. heavys+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-28 01:36:00
There's also a risk of your DeviceTree getting pruned from the kernel in X years when it's decided that "no one uses that board anymore", which is something that's happened to several boards I bought in the 2010's, but not something that's happened to any PC I've ever owned.
replies(2): >>MarsIr+i3 >>jrmg+d7
2. MarsIr+i3[view] [source] 2025-12-28 02:05:19
>>heavys+(OP)
Isn't this one of the benefits of ACPI? That the kernel asks the motherboard for the hardware information that on ARM SoCs is stored in the device tree?
replies(1): >>heavys+Ej
3. jrmg+d7[view] [source] 2025-12-28 02:59:10
>>heavys+(OP)
It’s weirded me out for a long time that we’ve gone from ‘we will probe the hardware in a standard way and automatically load the appropriate drivers at boot’ ideal we seemed to have settled on for computers in the 2000s - and still use on x86 - back to ‘we’ll write a specific description file for every configuration of hardware’ for ARM.
◧◩
4. heavys+Ej[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-28 05:35:41
>>MarsIr+i3
Yep
[go to top]