zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. ethbr1+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-24 15:30:56
I'm not an expert, but aren't Switzerland and Singapore pretty lightweight governments?
replies(2): >>RajT88+28 >>the_ga+G52
2. RajT88+28[view] [source] 2025-12-24 16:27:53
>>ethbr1+(OP)
Singapore is strange place - aside from being a city-state. You'll get sent to the gulags for being in possession of a joint, but prostitution is legal. I know a guy who once got in a bar fight there, and he immediately packed up and went to the airport.

I wouldn't exactly call it lightweight government.

replies(1): >>ethbr1+Em
◧◩
3. ethbr1+Em[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-24 18:13:17
>>RajT88+28
I have heard the policing is very strict, but I thought on the business side they were extremely laissez faire.
4. the_ga+G52[view] [source] 2025-12-25 14:02:55
>>ethbr1+(OP)
The graph here can get a bit wonky. And Switzerland is definitely the closest example of “limited government” working, I’d agree. But both of those countries, e.g., have universal healthcare. Switzerland through a more strict version of something like the ACA. Singapore, state-funded. Switzerland has compulsory military service, higher taxes, more gun regulations, etc. than the U.S. I think the U.S. beats these two on having a more conventionally “limited government” design.
[go to top]