zlacker

Caught up...??? I do use gemini pro regularly but never for code. chatGPT wins all the time. I even use chatGPT to review gemini suggestions...

Seems that there has been a lot of hype because in many ways, they are still lagging behind.

>>aatd86+(OP)
Gemini 3 blows GPT 5.1 out of the water. Beats it on quality and price.

>>mpalme+l
And speed.

>>mpalme+l
Sota is 5.2 pro or 5.2 codex or 5.2 extra high not 5.1 (I know I know it's confusing)

>>iamron+g4
Not least of all because I misread that as Sora at first, lol

>>aatd86+(OP)
What are you smoking? Gemini and Claude beat chatgpt at every metric.

>>PunchT+a6
They don’t. GPT 5.2 and its variants are the best models right now.

>>mpalme+l
Not in my experience (I use them every day). GPT 5.1 (now 5.2) is absolutely much more accurate for coding tasks. I think that 5.1. might even be better than gemini 3.

For PDF parsing and understanding, it's only anecdotal as it happened to me only once but Gemini was more accurate, that one time (a scientific paper).

Claude, when I was still subscribed to it, was in between gemini and GPT for code tasks. But the UI was too buggy and it was a bit too limited with their capacity threshold.

>>aatd86+(OP)
Possibly controversial take, but IMO Gemini 3 Flash is better than Pro for coding

>>PunchT+a6
The metrics being the benchmarks? Perhaps but apparently these are being gamed. Which makes sense. It's the natural tendency of people.

But in my daily usage? It's a fully different story.