zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. RajT88+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-23 17:44:34
That's a solution. Another would be to enshrine in law independent watchdog agencies whose goal is to win trophies for rooting out corruption, reducing waste, preventing or breaking up harmful monopolies, etc.
replies(2): >>jdietr+K1 >>dpark+M2
2. jdietr+K1[view] [source] 2025-12-23 17:55:48
>>RajT88+(OP)
How valuable are those trophies compared to bribes, or the tacit bribes of cushy "consultancy" roles? How do you stop lobbyists from gutting those regulators - what use is a fiercely independent regulator that has no resources?

Good governance is hard.

replies(1): >>RajT88+cM
3. dpark+M2[view] [source] 2025-12-23 18:02:11
>>RajT88+(OP)
> win trophies for rooting out corruption

Many a corrupt government has touted their anti-corruption activities that inexplicably seem to snare almost exclusively their political opponents.

◧◩
4. RajT88+cM[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-23 22:38:48
>>jdietr+K1
Getting money out of politics is the hardest part.

I am not sure how the US will find the political will short of getting burned badly enough for partisans to align on reform. How bad does it have to get?

replies(1): >>ethbr1+EY
◧◩◪
5. ethbr1+EY[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-24 00:22:05
>>RajT88+cM
The apt question is 'How bad for whom does it have to get?'

Because the 00s+ US government is in no way propped up by all stakeholding groups in equal amounts.

[go to top]