zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. candid+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-22 22:52:55
Maybe with these systems we should require them TO be open for anyone to query against. Maybe then people would care more about how they impact their privacy.
replies(2): >>toomuc+Y2 >>ipdash+gD
2. toomuc+Y2[view] [source] 2025-12-22 23:11:24
>>candid+(OP)
Flock’s objective is to hope people don’t care long enough to reach IPO. Will enough people care to dis enable this corporate dragnet surveillance apparatus? Remains to be seen. I don’t much care about the grift of dumping this pig onto the public markets (caveat emptor), but we should care about its continued use as a weapon against domestic citizens without effective governance and due process.
3. ipdash+gD[view] [source] 2025-12-23 05:07:15
>>candid+(OP)
IIRC, this happened in Washington state: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/11/washington-court-rules...

And as a result, they got rid of the cameras. Funny how that works!

[go to top]