zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. tw6000+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-22 17:53:37
Research anything and everything on your own dime. if it's taxpayer's money, then yes, it has to have at least a probability of profitability.
replies(4): >>techte+J1 >>maerF0+L1 >>unbeli+v2 >>Esopha+ah
2. techte+J1[view] [source] 2025-12-22 18:03:32
>>tw6000+(OP)
generating private profits are the best use of public money?
3. maerF0+L1[view] [source] 2025-12-22 18:03:39
>>tw6000+(OP)
And if there is a probability of profitability then there is a market to sell that opportunity for capital.

But in a high interest rate environment some ideas just arent worth exploring.

4. unbeli+v2[view] [source] 2025-12-22 18:06:41
>>tw6000+(OP)
So absurdly myopic to restrict research to what may be profitable in this moment. Why are you wasting time researching number theory bro, that'll never be useful. Why are you studying y^2 = x^3 + ax + b if it can't be turned into a SaaS unicorn tomorrow? So fucking stupid. The whole point is that commercial R&D can find the immediate to short term gains and make billions, while the long shots get funded without putting anyone at risk.
5. Esopha+ah[view] [source] 2025-12-22 19:15:00
>>tw6000+(OP)
If it could be profitable, the private sector would fund it.

Government funding can help with things that we decide are good for society, but not quite profitable financially.

Examples: CDC lead exposure research, Earthquake Early Warning System… even the tech we use today came out of non-commercialized funding (NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography and ARPANET).

[go to top]