zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. t1234s+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-19 16:53:56
These state required ID walls to use online services will eventually be required to access anything the internet.
replies(2): >>t1234s+g1 >>glouwb+V6
2. t1234s+g1[view] [source] 2025-12-19 16:59:09
>>t1234s+(OP)
Also I think this is the reason M$ and Apple offer (or forced in the case of M$) you to use an online account to log into your local machine. I believe this will be used in the future to allow people to legally use the internet or not at all. Would a world like this mean using Linux makes you an outlaw in certain areas?
replies(1): >>nancym+G2
◧◩
3. nancym+G2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-19 17:05:53
>>t1234s+g1
Maybe this will kill IoT. Alternately, I will become a smart fridge.
replies(1): >>01HNNW+l5
◧◩◪
4. 01HNNW+l5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-19 17:19:01
>>nancym+G2
No, corporations can always do whatever they want. And they won't allow a smart fridge to have a bank account or health care
5. glouwb+V6[view] [source] 2025-12-19 17:26:49
>>t1234s+(OP)
Maybe not the worst idea if we're looking to claim back what's been lost to LLM bots
replies(2): >>al_bor+p8 >>Macha+s8
◧◩
6. al_bor+p8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-19 17:34:18
>>glouwb+V6
I’m not sure how a surveillance state is better? That wouldn’t regain what we are losing to LLM bots, it would be yet another thing we’re losing.
◧◩
7. Macha+s8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-19 17:34:38
>>glouwb+V6
Nah, the only platforms left will sell the right to post ads into your feed and sell access to the data to the LLM companies
[go to top]