zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. asdff+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-18 01:02:45
So $40 a year? Does that imply all monero is mined like this because it's clearly not cost effective at all to mine legitimately?
replies(1): >>beefle+po
2. beefle+po[view] [source] 2025-12-18 05:46:18
>>asdff+(OP)
I think so, but it is hard to say. Could be a lot of people with extra power (or stolen power), but their own equipment. I mine myself with waste solar power
replies(1): >>Sohcah+ws2
◧◩
3. Sohcah+ws2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-18 19:19:58
>>beefle+po
Another option:

Deliberate heat generation.

If it's cold and you're going to be running a heater anyways, then if your heat is resistive, then running a cryptominer is just as efficient and returns a couple dollars back to you. It effectively becomes "free" relative to running the heater.

If you use a heat pump, or you rely on burning something (natural gas, wood, whatever) to generate heat, then the math changes.

replies(1): >>tgtwea+wT4
◧◩◪
4. tgtwea+wT4[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-19 15:01:52
>>Sohcah+ws2
Yeah the calculus on that becomes tricky when you have heat pumps since the coefficient of performance is >1 vs resistive heating (often 3-4 depending on the temperature).

I used a rack of GPUs to heat my house for a few years back when gpu mining was decently profitable, and my electricity bill was 3-4x more than with the heat pump - so you have to keep a close eye on the math when you're running at/under profitability.

[go to top]