zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. alwa+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-17 19:43:31
I can’t put my finger on anything within the last decade, but I seem to recall it running in something close to its current form on a single core on a single server for a long time:

>>5229522

Re: traffic, dang said (2022):

>>33454140

I took it as a good reminder that the hard part is the human part: that high-overhead features and UI fripperies are nice but not necessary (or sufficient) to keep a community healthy and vibrant over the decades.

(And on the subject of the human side, if you didn’t catch Anna Wiener’s 2019 profile, it’s here:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-silicon-valley/th... )

replies(2): >>tempes+b5 >>ilamon+E5
2. tempes+b5[view] [source] 2025-12-17 20:07:50
>>alwa+(OP)
The other reality is that as much as this industry is up its ass about scalability you can run a very very busy site on a single machine now a days.

A lot of people out here designing their blogs like its 1989.

replies(1): >>andy_p+OI4
3. ilamon+E5[view] [source] 2025-12-17 20:09:34
>>alwa+(OP)
From dang's 2022 comment about traffic:

The most interesting number is the 1300 submissions because that hasn't grown since 2011 - it just fluctuates. Everything else has been growing more or less linearly for a long time, which is how we like it.

I find that surprising, as 2011-2022 covers an exponential rise in SEO spam and "growth hackers" attempting to drive traffic and links.

Or was 1,300 the number of non-flagged submissions?

replies(1): >>dang+Ez4
◧◩
4. dang+Ez4[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-19 03:48:48
>>ilamon+E5
Nope, total submissions. And it's still very much within that same window!
◧◩
5. andy_p+OI4[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-19 05:55:11
>>tempes+b5
This is completely wrong, everyone knows you should rewrite everything in microservices immediately :-D
[go to top]